1. Berger talks a lot about "seeing things" and how we are always looking at the relation between things and ourselves. Do you ever take the time to think about the things that you are seeing and why we see them the way we do? What if something that we are looking at looks completely different to someone else who is looking at the same thing?
2. Is there a specific image that you can think of that means something incredibly significant to you, but might not mean anything to someone else?
3. Berger claims that "images are more precise and richer than literature" on page 10. Do you agree or disagree and why?
4. Have you ever seen something in person, such as a painting, that is completely different from what you expected after seeing it in a book or a magazine? Why do you think the camera either takes away or adds value to the uniqueness and appreciation of the piece?
Monday, February 16, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

No comments:
Post a Comment